| Jamie Dallaire on Mon, 2 Feb 2009 14:28:26 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: [s-b] Reassignment |
I claim j's below Answer to be INCONSISTENT. We've already gone through the debate, I think ais523's scam worked, and that is why. BP On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 4:25 PM, Jay Campbell <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Ed Murphy wrote: > >> Codae wrote: >> >> >> >>> I request that the Oracle ZOT this Consultation because there's probably >>> someone out there who understands the situation better than I do. >>> >>> >> >> I assign Consultation 203 to Priest j. >> >> > > I answer YES, Rule 5e57 still exists. > > Per the Contract, "ais523 may modify this contract by appending the > following text to rule 5e47, then repealing rule 5e57". > > This is not grant any abilities to modify the ruleset, and should be parsed > as, "ais523 may modify this contract after successfully becoming a dictator > through other means." > > > j > > _______________________________________________ > spoon-business mailing list > spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business > _______________________________________________ spoon-business mailing list spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business