| Jamie Dallaire on Mon, 2 Feb 2009 12:27:38 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: [s-b] [s-d] (no subject) |
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 1:19 PM, Jay Campbell <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > > >>>>> If only one Well-sharpened Pencil can exist, then WHO'S IS IT? Hmm? > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> The first Player to have purchased one. If you're really interested, > you > >>>> can go through the Archive to find out who. > >>>> > >>> > >>> Or possibly the last player to have purchased one. > >>> > >> > >> No, because that action would have caused to game objects to have the > >> same name and thus failed. > >> > > > > > > Next step: is there only one mack in existence? > > No, the ones that existed at the start of the era got grandfathered in > - just like the nday and I did. Yeah, I guess that's right. I don't know if macks actually have "names" (just like no one has argued that a weapon's name is "weapon", but only that the form of the rule actually does give weapons names), but if they do then I guess we'd all have 50 but not have received any for proposals or whatnot??? Oh, but anyone who destroyed mack at any time would be a bum. Methinks we might need a gamestate ratification right about now... I set my Mental State to Calm. [[used to be Trusting]] Billy Pilgrim _______________________________________________ spoon-business mailing list spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business