Jamie Dallaire on Mon, 2 Feb 2009 10:09:13 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-b] (no subject)


I find the Answer below to be Consistent. However, I may be the Supplicant.

On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 12:06 PM, M P Darke <darkemalcolm@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I have to say, that sounds ridiculous. I find this (if I can) INCONSISTENT.
>
>
> --- On Fri, 30/1/09, Jay Campbell <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Jay Campbell <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [s-b] Reassignments
> To: "B Nomic - Business" <spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Friday, 30 January, 2009, 1:25 AM
>
> I answer NO, only one well-sharpened pencil can and does exist, per
> Supplicant's reasoning.
>
>
> > I assign Consultation 205 to Priest j.
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-business mailing list
> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-business mailing list
> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
>
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business