[s-b] Consultation 202 on Early motnw Change

[Tyler <wisety@xxxxxxxxx>]

Consultation 202. I assign to Priest teucer.

Oh, and please call your arguments "Reasoning" or I might not archive it.
(Being under no obligation.)

On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Jay Campbell <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:

>
> I submit a consultation, "Did the motnw change today?" with an argument {
>
> "To perform a dependent action, a Player must first announce their intent
> to perform that action as a Game Action. Between 2 and 4 ndays after the
> intent was announced, the action may be performed by the Player if..."
>
> Even though in this case the motnw rule does not care about objections, the
> 2-to-4-nday waiting period still applies.
> }
>
> In fact, the final paragraph of 5E11, "All Players may Object or Support an
> action before it is performed as a Game Action," suggests that objections
> may be filed and prevent the dependent action even if the rule calling for
> support didn't mention objection.
>
>
>
> bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 17:30:05 +0000, Elliott Hird
>> <penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On 21 Jan 2009, at 17:07, <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> I change the motnw to: "This nweek's regularly scheduled emergency  has
>>>> been
>>>> pre-empted in order to bring you sanity.  Tune in next nweek when  we'll
>>>> bring you two emergencies."
>>>>
>>>>
>>> can't do that immediately
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Well, I did. You can submit a Consultation alleging that I violated the
>> rules.
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-business mailing list
> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
>



-- 
 -Tyler
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business