teucer on Tue, 20 Jan 2009 12:08:17 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-b] [s-d] oh come on


On 1/20/09, Elliott Hird <penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 20 Jan 2009, at 18:05, 0x44 wrote:
>
>> Argument: If post-Proposal 0585 Rule 0 game documents are Game
>> Documents, and Rule 0 explicitly claims precedence over all other
>> Rules, Rule 5e7 cannot define Game Documents. So, either game
>> documents are distinct from Game Documents, or Proposal 0585
>> destroys all Rules.
>
> This (and what ais523 says). It is absolutely not worth risking the
> game... let's vote AGAINST it to save B.

Agreed. I retract my vote on Proposal 585 and vote AGAINST it instead.

 - teucer
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business