| Alex Smith on Fri, 26 Dec 2008 15:12:08 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: [s-b] [s-d] Scam theft |
On Fri, 2008-12-26 at 17:09 -0500, Jamie Dallaire wrote: > On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 1:33 PM, Alex Smith <ais523@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Also, this > > rule explicitly defers to rule 5e0, and whenever this rule contradicts > > rule 5e0 this rule takes precedence. > > > WHAT does this mean? Seems like the two clauses in this sentence outright > contradict each other... > > Which clause, in a sentence about precedence, should take precedence? Whoops, I gave the wrong rule precedence. I change "Also, this rule explicitly defers to rule 5e0, and whenever this rule contradicts rule 5e0 this rule takes precedence." to "Also, this rule explicitly defers to rule 5e0, and whenever this rule contradicts rule 5e0 then rule 5e0 takes precedence." in the rules. -- ais523 _______________________________________________ spoon-business mailing list spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business