| Ed Murphy on Mon, 22 Dec 2008 13:08:11 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: [s-b] [s-d] Priest Re-Assignments 165, 168, 169 |
Billy Pilgrim wrote: > On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 1:41 PM, Charles Schaefer > <chuckles11489@xxxxxxxxx>wrote: > >> This says I got 168 and 169 and Murphy got 165, but you (Oracle BP) >> assigned >> them the opposite way. >> >> For the record, I see no errors with Murphy's answers on 168 and 169, and >> will probably just reissue them. > > > Oops. I assign Consultation 165 to Murphy and Consultations 168 and 169 to > w1n5t0n. I answer YES, re-submitting my previous arguments by reference: http://lists.ellipsis.cx/archives/spoon-business/spoon-business-200812/msg00342.html _______________________________________________ spoon-business mailing list spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business