Charles Schaefer on Tue, 16 Dec 2008 06:30:09 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-b] MoQ Report - Consultations 155-160 Priest Assignments


2008/12/14, Jamie Dallaire <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx>:
>
> On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 12:59 PM, Jamie Dallaire
> <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 10:07 PM, Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> >wrote:
> >
> >> I submit the following Consultation.
> >>
> >>  * Question:  Does the question from Consultation 159 have to do with
> >>    a matter of interpretation of the rules?
> >>
> >>  * Unbeliever:  ehird
> >>
> >> (I'm arguing for NO.  The process of answering it has to do with a
> >> matter of interpretation of Rule 5E36, but that's not the same thing.)
> >
> >
> This is Consultation 161. I assign it to Priest Charles.
>
> Oracle Billy Pilgrim


Answer: NO, for the reason submitted by the Supplicant.

-- 
> Charles Schaefer
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business