[s-b] Automatic actions?

[Christopher Specker <painstricken@xxxxxxxxx>]

I seek a consultation regarding Rules 4E70 and 4E79, for clarification 
purposes.

Question:  Presuming one corporation (hereafter called Party A) is an 
officer of another corporation, when Party A becomes obligated to 
perform an unambiguous Game Action by a Contract, is that Game Action 
performed as if the Player had sent it to the public forum?

Reasoning:  Both players and corporations are legal entities, and 
therefore eligible to become Officers of a Corporation.  According to 
4E70, "When a Player becomes obligated to perform an unambiguous Game 
Action by a Contract, that Game Action is performed as if the Player had 
sent it to the public forum."  I am trying to ascertain whether this 
distinction is deliberate or a simple case untidiness.
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business