Tyler on Thu, 21 Aug 2008 13:53:57 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-b] [s-d] Tweak,


I resolve the motion that adds to paragraph 3. It passes, 2:0. We two are
the only members, I believe, (your automatic member change happened after
the others bought their socks) so unanimity will work as long as nobody else
joins. Did anyone else become a member before you changed the text? If not,
we can do some quick changes as we wish.

On 8/20/08, Jamie Dallaire <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I vote FOR all motions in the Black Corporation.
>
> Billy Pilgrim
>
> On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 4:11 AM, Tyler <wisety@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Assuming that we're on the same page, I post the following motion for the
> > Articles of Incorporation of Black Corporation:
> > {{ Install Billy Pilgrim to the Office of Chamberlain, and Ty-Guy6 to the
> > Office of Taskmaster.
> > }}
> >
> > I also vote FOR the motion below that adds to paragraph 3.
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 11:15 PM, Tyler <wisety@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > >  I buy one black sock by paying 100m to the Black Corporation.
> > >
> > > /* I would say that the contract could use some amendment. To speed the
> > > processes we need to perform, let's make an amendment: */
> > >
> > > I post the following motion for the Articles of Incorporation of Black
> > > Corporation:
> > > {{ Paragraph 3 shall have added to the end, "If at any time all Voting
> > > Sockholders have voted FOR a Motion, and it has not failed, it
> > automatically
> > > succeeds." }}
> > >
> > > /* You should take Chamberlain; the Co. is your brainchild really. I'll
> > be
> > > Taskmaster, and get us (me) some employment.
> > >
> > > Are you aware that members of the contract are not parties to the
> > contract?
> > > This means the only thing that is legally binding is in the
> Incorporation
> > > rule: "Officers of a Corporation shall collectively ensure that the
> > > Corporation fulfills the obligations specified in its Articles. An
> > Officer
> > > can act on behalf of a Corporation by sending a message to the Public
> > Forum
> > > explicitly stating that the Actions described in the message are being
> > > performed by the Corporation." What legal entities, if any, are parties
> > to
> > > this contract? Are you or your bank?
> > > */
> > >
> > >   On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 6:15 PM, Jamie Dallaire <
> > > bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Oh hey, that's right.
> > >>
> > >> I transfer 2 Black Socks to the Black Corporation.
> > >>
> > >> Ty, do you have any preference in terms of which of the 3 offices you
> > >> want?
> > >> I'd be up for any, though we do need a Chamberlain and a Taskmaster
> > >> wouldn't
> > >> hurt.
> > >>
> > >> Anyone else?
> > >>
> > >> BP
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 9:05 PM, Tyler <wisety@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Well, Billy P, you do need to get a Chamberlain in there soon, since
> > >> he's
> > >> > supposed to pay you for the sock you're going to sell to the Co. so
> > that
> > >> I
> > >> > can buy it. (hint hint) Right now the Co. doesn't have one to sell,
> > >> > correct?
> > >> >
> > >> > On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 5:35 PM, Jamie Dallaire <
> > >> bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx
> > >> > >wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > > On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 10:09 PM, Tyler <wisety@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Actually, I like your work co-op. But I don't have the mack to
> buy
> > >> even
> > >> > > one
> > >> > > > sock. Maybe next week I will, when a few props of mine pass.
> > Unless
> > >> you
> > >> > > > were
> > >> > > > willing to loan me about 50 mack? First of all, you should
> resolve
> > >> that
> > >> > > > rewrite motion and dividend yourself something. You've got 500
> > mack
> > >> in
> > >> > > > there
> > >> > > > you probably don't want to share with me.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > I give m50 to Ty-Guy6.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > I vote FOR the last Motion I submitted in Black Corporation.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > I resolve the same Motion.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > I can't dividend myself except by using an unwieldy process that
> > >> involves
> > >> > > passing another motion to install myself in an office with
> > >> authorization
> > >> > to
> > >> > > do so. We currently have no officers. Don't need to do any
> > dividending
> > >> at
> > >> > > this point anyway, I figure.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Billy Pilgrim
> > >> > > _______________________________________________
> > >> > > spoon-business mailing list
> > >> > > spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> > >> > > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
> > >> > >
> > >> > _______________________________________________
> > >> > spoon-discuss mailing list
> > >> > spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> > >> > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
> > >>  >
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> spoon-business mailing list
> > >> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> > >> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > spoon-business mailing list
> > spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
> >
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-business mailing list
> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
>



-- 
  -Tyler
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business