Re: [s-b] [s-d] Proposal: Play Without Play

["Geoffrey Spear" <geoffspear@xxxxxxxxx>]

Well, if the Ministry of Play is so cumbersome that we need to change
the rules so we can start an nweek while it's vacant, I think we
should just get rid of it instead.

Making it less cumbersome would be my preferred alternative, though.
And if there's no current field match, you can pretty much assume that
people won't be afraid to take the Ministry.

I revise my Proposal "No More Play" to read:
{{
End the Current Field Match, destroy all Field Objects, clear the
Priority List and the Field.
}}

--Wooble

On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 4:14 PM, Mike McGann <mike.mcgann@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 8:35 PM, Geoffrey Spear <geoffspear@xxxxxxxxx>
>  wrote:
>
>  >
>
> > I submit the following Proposal entitled "No More Play", which
>  > Conflicts with Hose's "Play Without Play" Proposal:
>  > {{
>  > Repeal Rule 4E57 and Rule 4E58.
>  > }}
>
> >  <http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business>
>  >
>
>  B-Chess might not be working out, but someone might be able to come up with
>  something fun and playable using those rules. How about just destroying the
>  Field Match and Field Match instance? If so, I should probably remove the
>  amendment to Rule 14 and just amend Rule 57 to say that the Ministry is
>  allowed to be vacant if there is no current Field Match.
>
>  I was thinking of whipping up something like the classic game where you move
>  around and leave a trail behind you but you cannot move through an existing
>  trail. If you have no more valid moves, you lose. Or something like the game
>  Twixt. And if that bombs, we can just destroy that match and instance too.
>
>
>  - Hose
>  _______________________________________________
>  spoon-discuss mailing list
>  spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
>  http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
>
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business