| Roger Hicks on Tue, 19 Feb 2008 10:42:18 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: [s-b] Ministry of Questions report |
On Feb 19, 2008 10:34 AM, Roger Hicks <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Feb 19, 2008 7:24 AM, Justin Ahmann <quesmarktion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I claim Consultation 111 CONSISTENT. > > > Ack! I had an error in my report. On 14 Feb 2008 00:00 consultation > #111 was declared Inconsistent and needed to be re-assigned. > Fortunately, the state of emergency has suspended the due date for my > requirement to re-assign it. I will do so shortly. > > BobTHJ > No, wait. Strike that. The claim of inconsistency was made by Hose who was the Supplicant of the Consultation, and therefore it was invalid. There were no other claims. I updated my report to correctly show this consultation as Pondered. BobTHJ _______________________________________________ spoon-business mailing list spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business