| ihope on Thu, 7 Feb 2008 09:45:02 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: [s-b] [s-d] Rule Categorization |
On 07/02/2008, ihope <ihope127@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I answer this consultation NO, with the Oracularity of "All proposals > with the title of Enough Already! as well as all Consultations > numbered 105 are destroyed." If this Consultation didn't exist, > wonderful; if it did exist, now it doesn't. I Claim this answer to be Consistent, since I apparently can do that. --Ivan Hope CXXVII _______________________________________________ spoon-business mailing list spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business