Re: [s-b] Consultation: A Real Paradox This Time

["Roger Hicks" <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Feb 4, 2008 2:29 PM, Jamie Dallaire <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 2/4/08, Roger Hicks <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Jan 29, 2008 1:43 AM, Roger Hicks <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > On Jan 28, 2008 5:44 PM, Justin Ahmann <quesmarktion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > wrote:
> > > > I submit the following Consultation:
> > > > {
> > > > At the beginning of nday 8, nweek 134, would it have been possible for
> > the Player named Peter to claim Consultation 43 Consistent?
> > > >
> > > > Reasoning: There have been two nday 8, nweek 134s--one before ZOTTING
> > the Consultation, and the other afterward.
> > > > }
> > >
> > > This is Consultation #102. I assign it to Priest Anything McGee.
> > >
> > > Oracle BobTHJ
> > >
> > I re-assign this Consultation to Priest Billy Pilgrim
>
>
> I request that the Oracle ZOT this Consultation on the grounds that it is
> malformed. By this, I mean that it is unclear as to which instance of nday 8
> of nweek 134 it refers to. By its own admission, there were to such
> instances, yet this Consultation makes no effort to specify its target.
>

As requested by the Priest, I hereby ZOT Consultation #102.

Oracle BobTHJ
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business