Re: [s-b] [s-d] Proposal: So we can win by paradox

["Jamie Dallaire" <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Jan 27, 2008 8:01 PM, Justin Ahmann <quesmarktion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Wouldn't "Kurt Gödel Knows" be an improper answer, seeing as Kurt Gödel is
> the MoM?


Argh. Valid objection. I revise the proposal "So we can win by paradox" to
read:

{
> In Rule 4E18 (Judgment), replace the text:
> {{
> The selected Priest shall find inspiration in his knowledge of the Rules
> and, as a Game Action, Answer his assigned Consultation YES or NO.
> }}
> by:
> {{
> The selected Priest shall find inspiration in his knowledge of the Rules
> and, as a Game Action, Answer his assigned Consultation YES, NO, or
> PARADOX.
> }}
> and replace the text:
> {{
> For the purposes of answering Consultations the words "True",
> "Affirmative"
> and "Correct" are to be considered synonymous with "Yes", and the words
> "False", "Negative" and "Incorrect" are to be considered synonymous with
> "No".
> }}
> by:
> {{
> For the purposes of answering Consultations the words "True",
> "Affirmative"
> and "Correct" are to be considered synonymous with "Yes", the words
> "False",
> "Negative" and "Incorrect" are to be considered synonymous with "No", and
> the words "Maybe", "Undecidable" and "Göd Knows" are to be considered
> synonymous with "Paradox".
> }}
>
> Change the Trigger of the "Win by Paradox" Victory Condition to read:
> {{
> A Consultation on the possibility or legality of an action is Pondered
> with
> an Answer of PARADOX.
> }}
>
 }

Billy "Don't forget the umlaut!" Pilgrim
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business