Re: [s-b] Consultation: Criminal Case

[0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Roger Hicks wrote:
> On Jan 19, 2008 1:22 PM, Mike McGann <mike.mcgann@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>   
>> I hereby charge Codae with a Misdemeanor offense under Rule 59. I
>> submit the following Consutlation:
>>
>> {{
>> Is Codae guilty of violating Rule 59 for not updating the Public
>> Display for the Ministry of Questions?
>>
>> Unbeliever: Codae
>> }}
>>
>> Reasoning:
>> Rule 18 states that the Oracle is responsible for maintaining a Public
>> Display of the current Consultations. I interpret this to be an
>> obligation of the Ministry, and a Minister shall fulfill any
>> obligations as stated in Rule 53 which makes him liable under Rule 59.
>> I bring this case forward, not because the duties were not performed
>> in error or confusion, but because he willingly ducked these
>> responsibilities as an "experiment". I recommend the maximum fine of
>> m50, one point on his license, and two minutes in the penalty box.
>>
>>     
I answer this consultation NO. Rule 4e59 declares that spamming the fora 
is a crime punishable by a maximum fine of 100m and any points they 
would have received during the nweek.

-- 
--
0x44;

_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business