Re: [s-b] Voting + Some Game Actions

["Jamie Dallaire" <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 12/9/07, Geoffrey Spear <geoffspear@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Dec 9, 2007 7:27 PM, Jamie Dallaire <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > {
> > "As Rulekeeper, I change the number of Rule 1-17 to 1-22" is valid.
> >
> > Unbeliever: Wooble
> >
> > Reasoning: I think Rule 1-8 is pretty clear...
> > }
>
> This is Consultation 71.
>
> > {  "As Rulekeeper, I change the number of Rule 1-1 to 1-17" is valid.
> >
> > Unbeliever: Wooble
> >
> > Reasoning: No seriously, just read rule 1-8... :-p
> > }
>
> This is Consultation 72.
>
> > I humbly ask the Minister of Questions to assign these Consultations to
> > Priest Hose. Hose is the Player whose Repeal Proposal (Number 205) was
> > affected by these Actions.
>
> Actually, it's Proposals 202 and 212 that would be affected, both of
> which passed.
>
> 205 was your proposal and has nothing to do with either Rule 1-1 or  1-17.
>
> I not so humbly ZOT consultations 71 and 72 as I find them unworthy.


I declare Oracle Wooble's ZOTTING of Consultation 71, and his ZOTTING of
Consultation 72, to be invalid.

I take the Ministry of Questions.

I assign Consultations 71 and 72 to Priest Hose.

I bid all Players to join me in a game of Monopoly.

Oracle Billy Pilgrim
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business