Josiah Worcester on Sun, 9 Dec 2007 21:27:15 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-b] [s-d] Voting + Some Game Actions


On Sunday 09 December 2007 21:17:59 Jamie Dallaire wrote:
> The Oracle continues to defy me.
> 
> I usurp the Ministry of Questions.
> 
> Billy Pilgrim
> 
> On Dec 9, 2007 11:12 PM, Geoffrey Spear <geoffspear@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > On Dec 9, 2007 7:57 PM, Jamie Dallaire <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > You are entirely correct about the Proposal Numbers, Oracle. I did mean
> > to
> > > speak of Proposal 212. Your Proposal 202, however, was not included
> > because
> > > its effects pale beside the might of Proposal 212, by which they are
> > > engulfed mercilessly.
> > >
> > > That said, Oracle, I bid you to explain why you find my Consultations to
> > be
> > > unworthy, and to explain how I may correct them to bring their worth to
> > an
> > > acceptable level.
> >
> > Partially because they were not phrased in the form of Questions.
> >
> > Of course, I'm happy to admit that it was mostly because I'm not
> > afraid to abuse the power granted to me by the rules for the greater
> > good of maintaining the integrity of the democratic process.  It was
> > clearly not the will of the voters that the game cease to be called "B
> > Nomic" and if you can exploit one loophole in the Rules to try to
> > subvert that will I'm happy to exploit other loopholes to see that
> > it's not subverted.
> >
> > > Note that the Rules do not bind me to submitting a single Consultation
> > per
> > > declaration of invalidity.
> > >
> > > Also note that unless you explain your ZOTTING satisfactorily, I shall
> > usurp
> > > your position as Minister of Questions. No doubt all Players will agree
> > that
> > > these Consultations must be seen through.
> >
> > True, but I'd say if I can't muster a second Objection from somewhere
> > then my intuition about the will of the Players is clearly wrong, and
> > I'd then welcome an Oracularity declaring that the game shall
> > henceforth no longer be called B Nomic and that we still have a
> > Membership Test defined even if it's not used.
> >
> > --
> > Geoffrey Spear
> > http://www.geoffreyspear.com/
> > _______________________________________________
> > spoon-discuss mailing list
> > spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
> >
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-business mailing list
> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
> 
OBJECT.
The AFO requests to become a player. The AFO OBJECTS. The AFO forfeits.



_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business