Re: [s-b] Consultation 45 Answer; Blueprint

["Jamie Dallaire" <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx>]

*Same thing, I mean...

On 11/26/07, Jamie Dallaire <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 11/26/07, Geoffrey Spear <geoffspear@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Nov 25, 2007 11:08 AM, Jamie Dallaire <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx >
> > wrote:
> > > > A)
> > > >
> > > > {{
> > > > Is it true that any player can define a blueprint?
> > > > }}
> > >
> > >
> > > This is Consultation Number 45 and I assign it to Priest Wooble.
> >
> > I answer YES.
> >
> > While the rules don't explicitly allow the creation of Blueprints
> > except by the Artisan, they don't forbid it, either.  Everyone who
> > voted to foolishly repeal the Monopoly Rule may kick themselves.
> >
> > I create the following unique Blueprint "How to scam the system":
>
>
> WOW. Wooooooooooooooooow!
>
> I claim Priest Wooble's answer to be RIDICULOUSLY INCONSISTENT with
> established doctrine, and urge all fellow players of conscience to do
> likewise!!!
>
> I WOULD submit a consultation asking whether or not the Blueprint named
> "How to scam the system", but I am afraid that pseudo-Artisan /
> pseudo-Oracle (pseudo-GOD?) Wooble would feel empowered to ZOT said
> consultation before I had the chance to assign it to a Priest.
>
> By his reasoning, he could totally do that!!!
>
> "The Artisan may, as a Game Action on behalf of the Ministry of Goods and
> without 2 objections within 2 ndays, create a blueprint."
>
> "Alternatively the Oracle may wield the staff of ZOT and cause the
> Consultation to be ZOTTED"
>
> Some thing, right?
>
> Billy Pilgrim
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business