Re: [s-b] Concerning the AFO.

["Jamie Dallaire" <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Nov 22, 2007 4:54 PM, Josiah Worcester <josiahw@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> The AFO submits a Consultation on the following statement:
> The AFO is a valid Faction as well as a player.
>
> Reasoning:
> For the AFO being a faction:
> By rule 5-1, the AFO is an agreement, since the parties to the agreement,
> how
> to change the parties, the method of making actions on behalf of the
> agreement are all defined; only parties that have given consent to the
> agreement are governed by it, parties may leave the agreement at any time,
> and the agreement is publicly accessible to all players.
>
> By rule 5-2, the AFO is a faction, since the agreement was not previously
> a
> faction, at least one member of the AFO is a B Nomic player, and the AFO
> has
> decided to join B Nomic as a Faction.
>
> For the AFO being a player:
> See Consultation 39, which judged that the AFO is a player.


This is Consultation Number 52, which I assign to Priest 0x4461736864617368.

Billy Pilgrim
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business