Re: [s-b] [s-d] consultation

[Antonio Dolcetta <antonio.dolcetta@xxxxxxxxx>]

Antonio Dolcetta wrote:
> On 26 Feb 2007, at 19:05, comex wrote:
> 
>> I submit a Consultation:
>> {{
>> Question: If all Game Objects other than the Player named Wonko were
>> destroyed, would it be possible for me (the Supplicant of this  
>> Consultation)
>> to become a Player?
>> Unbeliever: Wonko
>> }}
> 

Ooops!

I'm currently trying to clear up the backward mess with Consultations in 
light of the possible clean start we are having next nweek.

I just realized I had misread this when I zotted it. It is indeed 
different from Consultation 5

Attempting to fix my mistake I resubmit it:

I submit a Consultation:
{{
Question: If all Game Objects other than the Player named Wonko were
destroyed, would it be possible for me (the Supplicant of this
Consultation)
to become a Player?
Unbeliever: Wonko
}}

_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business