Re: [s-b] [s-d] Votes

[bd <nomic@xxxxxxx>]

comex wrote:
> On Saturday 20 January 2007 7:46, bd wrote:
>> I vote as follows:
> Besides the fact that the lack of titles makes that quite confusing, YES and 
> NO are not valid votes. :)

Tsk, if you insist:

0061 FOR
0062 AGAINST [[ should be nweek ]]
0063 FOR
0064 FOR
0065 FOR [[ hmm... it'd be interesting to have variable exchange rates
between difference currencies based on supply and demand... ]]
0066 FOR
0067 FOR
0068 FOR
0069 ABSTAIN
0070 AGAINST
0071 AGAINST
0072 ABSTAIN
0073 FOR

There are two proposals in Proposals/0074 in the wiki. If these are in
fact two seperate proposals, then p(n) is defined to be n + 1.
Otherwise, p(n) is defined to be n.

0074 AGAINST
if p(0074) != 0074, I vote AGAINST on p(0074)

p(0075) AGAINST
p(0076) FOR
p(0077) ABSTAIN
p(0078) FOR.
p(0079) ABSTAIN
p(0080) FOR
p(0081) FOR


_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business