automailer on Sat, 17 Dec 2005 20:20:47 -0600 (CST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[s-b] [auto] comex votes


comex's votes:
Motion 302/4: Design Offering Undoing Bureaucratic Talisman : Maybe
Motion 303/3: Chad Handling And Rarity Issues Suggest Myriad Amendments : For
Motion 304/0: Require Immediate Puzzle Pod Location Execution : Against
If I'm holding a Puzzle Pod, I might as well vote against.

Motion 305/2: Set Amplitude Minimum Explicitly         : Maybe
Motion 307/1: Talismanic Rarity Incongruities Plead Emendation : For
Motion 308/0: Quest Queue Quite Quixotic               : For
Motion 309/0: Attempt at Proposal                      : For
Motion 310/1: Permitting Partial Pen Persistence       : For
Motion 311/0: Uncommonly Good Talismans                : For
Motion 312/0: A Fate Worse Than Death                  : Maybe
Motion 313/0: Superpowers, Take 3 (4?)                 : For
Sounds good, although with Protective Ink, couldn't you make the other player have -1 AP if e previously had 1?



This Message was sent automatically by the Wiki.
 Please do not reply to the sender of this message, as your replies will be ignored. Thank you.
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business