Re: [spoon-discuss] Re: [Spoon-business] NWEEK 56 RESULTS

[Daniel Lepage <dpl33@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Jan 30, 2004, at 5:37 PM, Daniel Lepage wrote:

> On Jan 30, 2004, at 4:59 PM, Baron von Skippy wrote:
>
> > > Proposal 1770/0 (Once More, With Less Suckage) (Baron von Skippy):
> > > AFF: Baron von Skippy x2, bd, Mikie The Inscrutable, The Pusher 
> > > Robot, Zarpint
> > > NEG: Glotmorf, Sagitta, SkArcher x3, Teucer, Wonko
> > > Counts (Y/N/A/S) : (6-6-0-0). Measure fails. Baron von Skippy loses 
> > > 3 points.
> > -Two things. The first is one of SkArcher's "NO" votes. The other is 
> > his other one. There were only two - one of them was shuffled off to 
> > proposal 1757.-
>
> Good point. I hereby use the Balefire Rod to produce Balefire; I use 
> the Balefire on vSET (note that the prop says nothing about needing to 
> possess the Rod in order to use it).
>
> Thus, vSET ceased to exist at the beginning of the nweek 56 Voting 
> Period. Which means it still doesn't exist now. So I can't have 
> targeted it with Balefire, 'cause it's not there to be targeted.
>
> Which means I didn't destroy it, and it's still here, so it's not.
>
> I can't see any good reason why this won't constitute "the existence 
> of a paradoxical condition that cannot be resolved under the current 
> set of rules.", which is an emergency under rule 0 ;)
>
> Of course, since Dave misdid this vote, e hasn't published the correct 
> voting results yet... so there's still time for em to veto it.


Oops, my mistake. I can't balefire vSET, 'cause it's a society.

I use balefire as mentioned above to zap bd's "Looting the Corpse" card.

Arguably, I could do it to the Watch, too, but it's slightly rule 
mandated...

--
Wonko

_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business