SkArcher on 27 Jan 2004 23:55:47 -0000

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [Spoon-business] NWEEK 56 BALLOT (Corrected)

On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 00:17:12 -0600 (CST), David E. Smith <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

The following measures are on the ballot for nweek 56:

Proposal 1756/0: Age before Beauty (Wild Card)

Proposal 1757/2: For the Love of Bob (The Pusher Robot)
NO (selective Lobbyist)

Proposal 1758/0: Repeal of the LOSA (Wild Card)

Proposal 1759/1: The Council Revisited (Wonko)
YES. I vote this way because by my count this splits the vote 3 vs 3 with 1 SHELVE vote, and so it will be shelved until the age groups are sorted out but I still get a contrary vote point.

Proposal 1760/0: Political Tafl (Teucer)

Proposal 1761/0: Allowing Actions Again (Wonko)

Proposal 1762/0: Standardized Elections (Wonko)
YES. same reasoning as 1759. you need to fix the vote counting method as it is rather nasty atm (may I suggest a direct sequential elimination?)

Proposal 1764/1: Nevinyrral's Disk (SkArcher)

Proposal 1765/0: Untitled Prop by SkArcher (SkArcher)

Proposal 1766/0: Gender Fix (Zarpint)

Proposal 1767/0: Pseudocoding is not a crime (Zarpint)
NO (selective Lobbyist)

I think it should stay a crime

Proposal 1768/1: Rewarding Strangeness (Zarpint)
NO. I don't like this and I see no need for it, but its a contrary vote point.

Proposal 1769/0: Attributes are very Stylish (Zarpint)
YES. And why not. I believe it gets shelved though.

Proposal 1770/0: Once More, With Less Suckage (Baron von Skippy)
NO. That, if you will excuse me pointing it out, Sucks.

spoon-business mailing list