Glotmorf on 20 Oct 2002 07:08:02 -0000


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [Spoon-business] CFI: Society Chutzpah


Mr. A...I rescinded CFI 1103 before you recognized it.  The email for that was the same one that created CFI 1106, as shown below:

On 10/4/02 at 11:23 AM Glotmorf wrote:

>On 10/4/02 at 9:15 AM Glotmorf wrote:
>
>>I make the following CFI:
>>
>>Statement: Rule 578 has a Chutzpah of 2.
>>
>>Analysis:
>>
>>Part of the text of Rule 578 includes, near the beginning of subsection F,
>>the text, "(Chutzpah 2)".  As there is no provision for a subsection
>>having its own Chutzpah, this Chutzpah statement must apply to the
>>entirety of Rule 578.
>>
>>That the text "(Chutzpah 2)" appears in the text of Rule 578 is sufficient
>>for the purposes of Rule 33 to indicate Rule 578's Chutzpah is other than
>>1.
>
>I rescind this CFI.  Funny...I thought Rule 497 had been repealed.
>
>I do make the following CFI, though:
>
>Statement: Members of a Society may vote, regardless of whether or not
>they are players, in order to cast a "yes" vote on their Society's
>proposals.
>
>Analysis:
>
>Rule 497 says individual subsections of rules can have their own Chutzpah.
>
>Rule 578 subsection F has a Chutzpah of 2.
>
>Rule 578 subsection F says Members of a Society auto-vote "Yes" on the
>Society's proposals.
>
>Rule 15 says game entities other than players may vote if permitted to by
>a rule with a higher Chutzpah.
>
>Therefore, members of a Society can vote, inasmuch as they can cast a
>"Yes" vote on that Society's proposals.
>
>						Glotmorf
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>spoon-business mailing list
>spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
>http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business



_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business