David E. Smith on 17 Jan 2002 08:20:31 -0000


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

spoon-business: The Daily Recognizer (Thursday morning, technically)


Or maybe it's Wednesday night. Depends on your time zone.

Anyway.

Rob has ruled on CFJ 251, which clears up the last of the questions
regarding the previous ballot. Yay.

Thus: Proposal 202/0 failed (3-10), 221/2 failed (5-8), and 226/0 passed
(7-6). Glotmorf loses 4, loses 5, and scores 9 points, respectively. (I
swear I didn't make that up - the fact that I don't have to change eir
score is just a keen coincidence.) 226/0 has no effect, since it
explicitly depended upon the passage of another proposal (which didn't
pass).

Bean submitted two CFJs - they are 272 and 273, assigned to Baron von
Skippy and Uncle Psychosis, respectively, in spite of the fact that at
least the latter seems to have been rendered moot.

Bean has ruled on CFJ 254. As an (indirect?) result of this, points will
be awarded based on the voting for Proposal 229/0, and its
self-modification clause kicks in.
Created 259/1.
Antonio, Congenital Optimist, Fenrir, gritter, Iain, Scoff!, Uncle
Psychosis, and The Voice score 23 points; Bean, Glotmorf, Joerg, Rob, and
Wonko lose 17 points.

The Voice has ruled on CFJ 249.

The Voice's "Once and for all..." is 274/0.

Fenrir and Octagon have forfeited. They're dropping like flies...

Scoff! pointed out that the historical proposal pages don't list
proposals' authors. I'll try to fix that one soonish - should only be a
five minute fix or so, but these things tend to spiral away from me. :)

Congenital Optimist has ruled on CFJ 227.

Congenital Optimist's revision of "Boys will be Girls..." is 267/1.

The Administrator sighs as more massive judicial reforms (and the
requisite lots of typing) seem imminent...

(I'd also like to point out that if players want to transfer points, they
can simply DO SO instead of going through bizarre gyrations involving
modifying Rule 1. You could also simply specify it as an action in your
proposal instead, if you want some formal record of your action. In fact,
I'd rather prefer that, because that way I don't have to modify rules
multiple times, thus staving off the inevitable brain embolism.)

"You Break the Law, You Pay the Price" is 275/0.

"Thou Shalt Never Go Against The Rules!" is 276/0.

...dave


---- David E. Smith, POB 515045, St. Louis MO 63151
http://www.technopagan.org/    http://metadave.net/
http://www.bureau42.com/       http://whatIsay.com/

"Use anger to throw them into disarray." -- Sun Tzu