spoon-business: YARFJ

[Dan <wald7330@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I submit a new RFJ:

M22, by Jeff Schroeder, text quoted below, did not result in a Motive
order requiring Poulenc to transfer 30 points to the bank, because its
wording and type (Bank Motion) were directed at the Bank, not at Poulenc.

Text of M22:
"I create a new Bank Motion requiring the bank to reclaim 30 out of the 
current 60 outstanding points from Poulenc.  This will reduce Poulenc's 
debt by 30."

Ordering the Bank to reclaim 30 points from Poulenc is not the same as
ordering Poulenc to transfer 30 points to the Bank.  And a Bank motion is
not the same as a Motion for Repayment--they have different definitons
under the rules.

The Judge is encouraged to refer to R317/2 "The Bank" and R319/0 "Points
Owed".

Poulenc.