Michael Gorman on Mon, 28 Aug 2006 10:55:02 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [eia] Battle of Leopoldstadt resolution


At 11:42 AM 8/28/2006, you wrote:
>I like solution #2 best.  This seems similar to the FORCED WAR DECLARATIONS
>rules (4.6.4.2) for attacking a neutral minor.
>
>I agree that a MP cannot fight a MP they are not at war with (w/ the naval
>exception that Joel pointed out).  I think each side should decide via
>escrow whether to attempt to reinforce or not.  After that, if both decide
>to reinforce and both do so successfully then they do so with the knowledge
>that they each *must* declare war on the other per 4.6.4.2 This states that
>"If two or more MPs do not back down ...each *must* declare war on all MPs
>also attacking... (unless already at war with them)".
>
>As a benefit, 4.6.4.2.1 states that this "costs the same as declaring war on
>*one* MP".

How will this interact with enforced peace?

_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia