Re: [eia] Round 3 at 2-1 table, we get a mutual break after all...

["J.J. Young" <jjy@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Reading through the rules, it would appear Mike is correct, although that
blows.

-JJY

----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Gorman" <mpgorman@xxxxxxxx>
To: "public list for an Empires in Arms game" <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 12:26 PM
Subject: Re: [eia] Round 3 at 2-1 table, we get a mutual break after all...


> At 11:17 AM 8/11/2006, you wrote:
> >3 straight 4s, that's the ticket.
> >5% will do 2 more casualties, total of 9 to the French and Neapolitans,
but
> >there is a mutual break, I'm assuming, and we retreat to Venice? Closest
> >depot is Salzburg, Munich, Ulm, and Trieste, all 2 hexes away.
>
> While I still wait for Austria to get a bad roll, I'm sure it will happen
> someday, this retreat does raise an issue.  The forces now at Venice used
> movement as part of forage.  Is it therefore possible for them to besiege
> the city?
>
> _______________________________________________
> eia mailing list
> eia@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
>
>


_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia