Re: [eia] Russian repatriation

["J.J. Young" <jjy@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Question:  would Prussian garrisons still prevent my cossacks from cutting
French supply lines ?

The rules say that supply is not cut if a "friendly" corps or garrison is in
the same area.  But I thought that this game's definition of "friendly" was
your own major power's forces and those of the minor countries you control.
We may have been playing this incorrectly.

-JJY

----- Original Message -----
From: "J.J. Young" <jjy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "public list for an Empires in Arms game" <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 6:28 AM
Subject: Re: [eia] Russian repatriation


> Going back over the records I find that a majority of the present players
> (Joel, Mike, Jim, and myself, who in fact were everyone that voted at the
> time) were in favor of using the Limited Access rules after a peace when
we
> were starting the current game in late July last year.  So throw out the
> repatriated map I sent.
>
> -JJY
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Michael Gorman" <mpgorman@xxxxxxxx>
> To: "public list for an Empires in Arms game" <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Monday, July 24, 2006 7:01 PM
> Subject: Re: [eia] Russian repatriation
>
>
> > At 10:39 PM 7/23/2006, you wrote:
> > >The I corps at Danzig and Konigsberg are moved to the area W of Kovno.
> > >
> > >The depot at Danzig is removed from the map.
> > >
> > >The cossack S of Konigsberg is moved to Brest-Litovsk.
> > >
> > >The cossack at Kustrin is moved to Hamburg.
> > >
> > >-JJY
> >
> > Repatriation?  Since when were we not using the access after peace rules
> > this time?
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > eia mailing list
> > eia@xxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
> >
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> eia mailing list
> eia@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
>
>


_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia