Re: [eia] [escrow] July 1806 Political Orders

["J.J. Young" <jjy@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Just for the record, I wasn't putting a condition (and couldn't, according
to the rules) on the offer of Informal Peace, I was just making it public
what Prussia had promised to do in exchange.  That's why I said the bit
about how Prussia's promise not binding.

-JJY

----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Gorman" <mpgorman@xxxxxxxx>
To: "public list for an Empires in Arms game" <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, July 24, 2006 7:40 PM
Subject: Re: [eia] [escrow] July 1806 Political Orders


>
> >Russia offers Prussia an informal peace, based on Prussia's promise to
> >rescind French access to Masovia, Posen, East and West Prussia.
>
> This does raise an important question.  On it's face, this is not a viable
> statement.  Russia is not allowed to put conditions of this sort on a
peace
> agreement, certainly not an informal peace.  The only way this works is if
> access is put before the peace step in the political phase.  Otherwise
> Russia has to offer the peace or not and hope Prussia keeps its word.
>
> Since the access step is kluged into the political phase in an undefined
> manner, where in the order is it?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> eia mailing list
> eia@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
>
>


_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia