Re: [eia] Russian repatriation

[Joel Uckelman <uckelman@xxxxxxxxx>]

Thus spake Michael Gorman:
> At 06:04 PM 7/24/2006, you wrote:
> >Thus spake Michael Gorman:
> > > At 10:39 PM 7/23/2006, you wrote:
> > > >The I corps at Danzig and Konigsberg are moved to the area W of Kovno.
> > > >
> > > >The depot at Danzig is removed from the map.
> > > >
> > > >The cossack S of Konigsberg is moved to Brest-Litovsk.
> > > >
> > > >The cossack at Kustrin is moved to Hamburg.
> > > >
> > > >-JJY
> > >
> > > Repatriation?  Since when were we not using the access after peace rules
> > > this time?
> >
> >This is one of the two optional rules where we were never able to come to an
> >agreement that satisfied everyone. (There are several discussions of
> >repatriation in the archive, if memory serves.)
> 
> Yes, but my understanding at the beginning of this game is we were going to 
> use it finally.
>

I remember being in favor of it, because I've always thought repatriation
is a dumb rule, but I was under the impression that we didn't reach a
consensus on it. There was some point in the past---maybe when Bill
joined?---when someone asked about which optional rules we were using,
and I think that I might even have replied then, but I can't find it
in the archive at the moment.

-- 
J.
_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia