James Helle on Sun, 23 Apr 2006 22:21:36 -0400 (EDT)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [eia] London results


Yes, there are no garrison factors in London at this point.

-----Original Message-----
From: eia-bounces@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:eia-bounces@xxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of
J.J. Young
Sent: Sunday, April 23, 2006 6:57 PM
To: public list for an Empires in Arms game
Subject: Re: [eia] London results


I assumed that GB would want to take its casualties from the garrison first.
Was a French corps removed as a result of the battle ?

-JJY

----- Original Message -----
From: "J.J. Young" <jjy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "public list for an Empires in Arms game" <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, April 23, 2006 9:15 PM
Subject: Re: [eia] London results


> Great Britain gains +1 PP, since there was a corps inside London.
>
> -JJY
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "James Helle" <jhelle@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "public list for an Empires in Arms game" <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Sunday, April 23, 2006 8:35 PM
> Subject: [eia] London results
>
>
> > Apparently Bill and Mike sent their emails as I was sending mine.  So it
> > seems we agree on 7 factors for each side.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > eia mailing list
> > eia@xxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
> >
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> eia mailing list
> eia@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
>
>


_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia

_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia