Re: [eia] 2nd Battle of the Forth, Coalition roll

Joel Uckelman on Tue, 14 Mar 2006 17:01:31 -0600 (CST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [eia] 2nd Battle of the Forth, Coalition roll

To: public list for an Empires in Arms game <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [eia] 2nd Battle of the Forth, Coalition roll
From: Joel Uckelman <uckelman@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 00:01:29 +0100
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 14 Mar 2006 17:51:24 EST." <07f701c647b9$d2ac31e0$6b01a8c0@tfilmore>

Thus spake "William Jaffe":
> Not correct, see the rules citation in 6.3.1.1

I was looking at 6.3.1.1 when I replied originally.

What I'm claiming is that 6.3.1.1 doesn't apply because this is neither
a case where there's a phasing player, nor one where we have an interception,
and so 6.2.6.1 is the controling rule.
 
-- 
J.
_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia

References:
- RE: [eia] 2nd Battle of the Forth, Coalition roll
  - From: William Jaffe

Prev by Date: [eia] Not true, see 6.3.1.1, it's explicit, France is the attacker.
Next by Date: [eia] Interception after Fleets are forced from a port
Previous by thread: RE: [eia] 2nd Battle of the Forth, Coalition roll
Next by thread: RE: [eia] 2nd Battle of the Forth, Coalition roll
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread