RE: [eia] A six-player game

["Fred Dilley" <fdilley@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

I don't know enough to have an opinion on issue two. I'll go with the 
general opinion.

> From: "J.J. Young" <jjy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reply-To: public list for an Empires in Arms game <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: "public list for an Empires in Arms game" <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [eia] A six-player game
> Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 16:00:12 -0400
>
> Barring some miracle, it now appears that we will be starting a six-player 
> game.  So some questions arise:
>
> 1.)  Does not having a full seven-player game cause anyone to decide it's 
> not worth playing ?  I, for one, will play regardless.
>
> 2.)  Should we handle the seventh country (Spain) using the UMP rules 
> (which I dislike and Mike loathes with a passion), or by bidding for Spain 
> separately after the other 6 countries have been chosen ?  When one player 
> runs two countries, _both_ must meet their victory conditions for that 
> player to win.
>
> I think we'll be ready to bid once we've heard from everyone on those two 
> points.
>
> -JJY
>
> _______________________________________________
> eia mailing list
> eia@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia


_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia