Re: [eia] impasse

["J.J. Young" <jjy@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

I always thought it would be cool to try playing Spain.  Austria's the
uninteresting one to me.

-JJY

----- Original Message -----
From: "Joel Uckelman" <uckelman@xxxxxxxxx>
To: "public list for an Empires in Arms game" <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 9:27 AM
Subject: Re: [eia] impasse


> Thus spake "J.J. Young":
> > This email is written on the assumption that we're starting over, which
we
> > aren't neccessarily.
> >
> > On the issue of UMP rules; I don't like them, and I know there are
others
> > that feel more strongly about it than me.  In fact, if a seventh player
does
> > not present him/herself, rather than use the UMP rules I would rather
have
> > us bid for the first six countries, and then bid again (if desired) to
add
> > Turkey as a second country.  There is a parallel set of rules for
handling
> > this (parallel to the UMP rules, that is, but much simpler); both
countries
> > controlled by one player have to meet their victory conditions, and the
two
> > countries can never go to war.  Nobody seems very fond of the idea of
> > running Turkey as their sole country, anyway.
> >
> > Just throwing the idea into the pot.
>
> I would much rather play Turkey than Spain, for the record.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> eia mailing list
> eia@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
>
>


_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia