|Michael Gorman on Thu, 10 Mar 2005 13:09:40 -0600 (CST)|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
|Re: [eia] Austrian Land Phase, Dec. '06|
At 09:50 AM 3/10/2005, you wrote:
Thus spake Michael Gorman: > At 08:17 AM 3/10/2005, you wrote: > >It would seem I've been operating the whole time on a misunderstanding > >about where depots can and cannot be placed. Interesting that I > >apparently haven't broken the rule before. > > > >So it looks like if I replace the depot at Ulm and move the depot NE of > >Kassel to Frankfurt I should be fine. That will increase my expenses by > >$8, to $39 for the month. > > > >The corps at Lyon will stay in place. > > As long as you have the extra $8 that works just fine. I wasn't sure how > much cash you'd set aside so didn't know how big an issue that would turn > out to be. Mike, there's a breach at Konigsberg for you to respond to, in case you missed it. (Also a breach at Damascus for Kyle to respond to.)
I did forget the one at Konigsberg. That garrison will fight and make sure those rascally Russians didn't send an undersized corps to fool us into surrendering. I won't bother sending out rolls unless it is actually possible for the garrison to survive long enough for it to matter.
I hadn't answered the Austrian ones since I wasn't sure he'd have the extra cash left over from October to pay another $8.
The Erfurt garrison will fight, might as well get a census of the Austrians.I'll want to know the size of the Wurttemburg corps before I decide what Dresden will do, in case I have the wrong number recorded.
Mike _______________________________________________ eia mailing list eia@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia