Re: [eia] Austrian Land Phase, Dec. '06

[Michael Gorman <mpgorman@xxxxxxxx>]

At 09:50 AM 3/10/2005, you wrote:
> Thus spake Michael Gorman:
> > At 08:17 AM 3/10/2005, you wrote:
> > >It would seem I've been operating the whole time on a misunderstanding
> > >about where depots can and cannot be placed.  Interesting that I
> > >apparently haven't broken the rule before.
> > >
> > >So it looks like if I replace the depot at Ulm and move the depot NE of
> > >Kassel to Frankfurt I should be fine.  That will increase my expenses by
> > >$8, to $39 for the month.
> > >
> > >The corps at Lyon will stay in place.
> >
> > As long as you have the extra $8 that works just fine.  I wasn't sure how
> > much cash you'd set aside so didn't know how big an issue that would turn
> > out to be.
>
> Mike, there's a breach at Konigsberg for you to respond to, in case you
> missed it. (Also a breach at Damascus for Kyle to respond to.)

I did forget the one at Konigsberg.  That garrison will fight and make sure 
those rascally Russians didn't send an undersized corps to fool us into 
surrendering.  I won't bother sending out rolls unless it is actually 
possible for the garrison to survive long enough for it to matter.


I hadn't answered the Austrian ones since I wasn't sure he'd have the extra 
cash left over from October to pay another $8.

The Erfurt garrison will fight, might as well get a census of the Austrians.

I'll want to know the size of the Wurttemburg corps before I decide what 
Dresden will do, in case I have the wrong number recorded.

Mike

_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia