Nate Ellefson on Thu, 10 Mar 2005 08:17:43 -0600 (CST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

RE: [eia] Austrian Land Phase, Dec. '06

It would seem I've been operating the whole time on a misunderstanding
about where depots can and cannot be placed.  Interesting that I
apparently haven't broken the rule before.

So it looks like if I replace the depot at Ulm and move the depot NE of
Kassel to Frankfurt I should be fine.  That will increase my expenses by
$8, to $39 for the month.

The corps at Lyon will stay in place.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: eia-bounces@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:eia-bounces@xxxxxxxxx] On 
> Behalf Of Michael Gorman
> Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2005 12:27 PM
> To: public list for an Empires in Arms game
> Subject: Re: [eia] Austrian Land Phase, Dec. '06
> At 08:27 AM 3/9/2005, you wrote:
> >Depot removal: Salzburg, SW of Salzburg, N of Milan, S of Stuttgart, 
> >Munich, Mainz, S of Mainz Depot creation: Krakow, Kassel, NE 
> of Kassel, 
> >N of Nuremburg, Venice
> >($5)
> The depot at Kassel cannot act as the supply source the 
> depots NE of Kassel 
> and N of Nuremburg are built upon as it did not exist before 
> this turn.
> The depot at Ulm could be left on the board to create the one N of 
> Nuremburg but I don't believe it is possible to place a depot 
> NE of Kassel 
> this turn.
> _______________________________________________
> eia mailing list
> eia@xxxxxxxxx

eia mailing list