James Helle on Wed, 13 Oct 2004 20:04:35 -0500 (CDT)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [eia] Third Prussian roll at Dresden


The "three" was a typo, guys.  I did deduct six infantry as casualties.
Sorry for the confusion.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Gorman" <mpgorman@xxxxxxxx>
To: "public list for an Empires in Arms game" <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 11:27 PM
Subject: Re: [eia] Third Prussian roll at Dresden


> At 08:40 PM 10/12/2004, you wrote:
> >So the Prussians kill three French infantry factors as they run away.
Nice
> >shooting, Mike.  :)
> >
> >BTW Mike, the corps at Wittenburg traveled through the Brandenburg area
and
> >do _not_ cross the river.  I wanted to be clear about this in case it
> >affected your chit choice.
>
> Thanks for that detail.
>
> The French also should have lost six factors since the flanking force
> counts as double its number of factors for casualty causing.  So even
> though they looked like a mere 22 factors, they fought like 39.
>
> Mike
>
> _______________________________________________
> eia mailing list
> eia@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
>

_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia