Re: [eia] Turkish naval phase, Aug. '05

["James Helle" <jhelle@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

This sounds very much like the argument I made when the German forces (under
British control) abandoned their capital to flush out France's fleets by
beseiging the ports they were docked in.  Legal, but not very practical.

JRH
----- Original Message -----
From: "Joel Uckelman" <uckelman@xxxxxxxxx>
To: "public list for an Empires in Arms game" <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, July 16, 2004 12:16 PM
Subject: Re: [eia] Turkish naval phase, Aug. '05


> Thus spake "Kyle H":
> > The Turkish fleet holds at Constantinople.
> > The Portuguese fleet maintains its blockade of St. Petersburg.
> >
> > kdh
>
> Does it bother anyone else that the rules give players so much latitude
with
> minor countries? Given the rules, what Kyle's doing makes sense, but I
think
> it would be hard to convince the Portuguese that blockading St. Petersburg
> serves their interests when Portugal is at war with Spain and isn't being
> threatened by Russia.
>
> _______________________________________________
> eia mailing list
> eia@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
>

_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia