J.J. Young on Sun, 30 May 2004 14:18:21 -0500 (CDT)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [eia] Battle of Christiana


The emails got to me in a strange order; I got Jim's rolls before the chit
choices, and happened to check my email in the interval in between.
Strange, though.

-JJY

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Michael Gorman" <mpgorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "public list for an Empires in Arms game" <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, May 30, 2004 1:31 PM
Subject: Re: [eia] Battle of Christiana


> At 01:07 PM 5/30/2004 -0400, you wrote:
> >???  Did the rest of us get a copy of the chit choice ?
> >
> > >From Jim's 4-1, 3-1, 2-1, I guess it's Echelon vs. defend.  Since the
> >tactical ratings are 2 for Prussia (due to Hohenloe)and 1 for Sweden (2-1
> >for 2 corps), the Swedes would be rolling at -1.  If, as I suspect, the
> >Prussian forces have 4 or more cavalry factors, they will be rolling on
+1.
> >
> >-JJY
> You should have.  It came through to me from the list.
>
> Mike
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> eia mailing list
> eia@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
>
>


_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia