Re: [eia] Second Battle of Naples, July 1807

[Joel Uckelman <uckelman@xxxxxxxxx>]

Thus spake menexenus@xxxxxxx:
>    I am assuming that since no declaration was made prior to sending out comb
> at rolls, Joel 
> intended to keep Pechlivan's tactical rating at 4 (to get +1) rather than dro
> pping it to 3 (to make 
> Spain roll at -1).  Whether or not this was Joel's intention, it seems to be 
> the only fair way to 
> handle the situation.  The default assumption must be that you are using your
>  commander's full 
> tactical rating unless you say otherwise.  Would the rest of you agree?
> 
> kdh

I never had the option of doing that. We both have corps in excess of our 
tactical maxima. My modified tactical rating is 3, and Spain's is 2.

-- 
J.


_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia