Re: [eia] limited access revisions

Everett E. Proctor on 9 Oct 2003 09:17:26 -0000

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [eia] limited access revisions

To: public list for an Empires in Arms game <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [eia] limited access revisions
From: "Everett E. Proctor" <spiritmast@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2003 04:16:53 -0500
In-reply-to: <009801c38e06$d161ee70$1092570c@KylesDell4500>
References: <3F835DE42A8.BCB5SPIRITMAST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <009801c38e06$d161ee70$1092570c@KylesDell4500>

> Well, that may be so, but the only reason
> you'd be foolish not to demand an unconditional surrender is because of the
> unbalanced rules. 

No, the reason is because you've over-extended your forces and have left
enemy forces between your forces and your home nation.  This is
frequently a disadvantage in many wargames.

-Everett

_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [eia] limited access revisions
  - From: Michael Gorman

References:
- Re: [eia] limited access revisions
  - From: Everett E. Proctor
- Re: [eia] limited access revisions
  - From: Kyle H

Prev by Date: [eia] test
Next by Date: [eia] Austria reinforcements
Previous by thread: Re: [eia] limited access revisions
Next by thread: Re: [eia] limited access revisions
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread