Re: [eia] Spanish Mistake??????????????????????

["J.J. Young" <jjy@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

I have just sent you feedback.  I apologize that I was away from my computer
all afternoon and didn't reply sooner.

-JJY

----- Original Message -----
From: "Danny Mount" <mount.23@xxxxxxx>
To: <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2003 5:51 PM
Subject: [eia] Spanish Mistake??????????????????????


> Ok guys.  I have sent emails to two different players and NEITHER of them
> have written me back yet.  Before this gets any further out of hand
without
> my input, my intentions were to use my fleet in Cartagena to transport one
> of my corps in Barcelona down to Morocco.  Since no one is seeing this I
> assume that I have errored in my ability to do this.  I thought that as
long
> as a corps is in a port city and the fleet in transport has enough
movement
> then I would be able to do this.  Will someone please let me know the
ruling
> on this!
>
> Also, I did have a corps marker purchased and infantry able to be placed
in
> Cadiz but I thought that my tactic was sound in the above plan.
>
> If I have made a mistake, then I can definitely live with it, but all I
want
> is some feedback!
>
> -DEM
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: eia-admin@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:eia-admin@xxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Kyle
> H
> Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2003 5:24 PM
> To: eia@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [eia] Spanish Reinforcement Phase (Sept. 05)
>
>
>     This is exactly why I think Joel's suggestion is a bad way to go.
> Rather than relying on observable phenomena (like whether there is a corps
> on the map) we are supposed to rely on unobservables on the declarer's
> national card.  Essentially, this makes it possible for a country with a
> fleet in port to declare war on virtually anything.  (After all, he
*might*
> build a corps...)
>     I think this is the wrong way to go, but I don't care enough about it
to
> argue strenuously.  Whatever you guys want...
>
> kdh
>
> > Thus, if Danny can confirm that he had both 1) a purchased corps, and 2)
> at
> > least one factor that could have been placed in it, the DoW should
stand.
> > Otherwise, the DoW wasn't legal.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > eia mailing list
> > eia@xxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> eia mailing list
> eia@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> eia mailing list
> eia@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
>
>


_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia