----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 10:09
AM
Subject: [eia] Games are supposed to be
fun
Kyle and Mike,
If the current rules dispute
is now to become heated and personal, I am no longer interested in
recieving emails about it. Please make use of private channels rather
than the eia list, or find some other way to leave me out. I for one
will simply vote on my preference. My suggestion to anyone else who
wants to put this behind us is to do the same.
BTW, I am assuming here that my interpretations
of the 2 alternate plans were correct, since they were left uncommented
upon.
Although Kyle's plan has the simplicity of
looking at the map and knowing whether or not there is a siege, I do have
a slight preference for Mike's plan, which I think more closely conforms to
the rules as written, but with the following caveats:
1.) A defender in a city should be able to
build a sea supply depot there whether the attacker outside is laying siege or
not.
2.) All or none of the attacking corps that
end up surrounding a city must lay siege to that
city.