Re: [eia] British land phase, 3/05

["J.J. Young" <jjy@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Actually, the Turkish fleet would have been forced out into the blockade
box, not the sea space, which is the same as a port as far as maintenance
costs go.  So no big deal.

-JJY

----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Gorman" <mpgorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, July 27, 2002 1:06 AM
Subject: Re: [eia] British land phase, 3/05


> As I recall, the Turkish 2nd fleet wanted to hang out in Damietta for this
> economic phase.  Once the two Turkish Corps left, this city became
> controlled by Egypt again and the fleet would have been forced out into
the
> sea space.  Would Turkey have rather put the fleet someplace where it
would
> still be in port for upkeep purposes?  It didn't seem a big deal until
> Egypt put a depot in the same city as a Turkish fleet.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> eia mailing list
> eia@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
>
>


_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia