Re: [eia] question answered and Turkish naval setup

["J.J. Young" <jjy@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

OK, that additional rule clears it up.  Sorry for my incorrect
interpretation of the incomplete rule.

-JJY

----- Original Message -----
From: "Joel Uckelman" <uckelman@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, June 08, 2002 9:29 PM
Subject: [eia] question answered and Turkish naval setup


> I was just paging through the rules, and happened upon 10.7:
>
> "Normally the major power controlling Constantinople controls access
> through the Dardanelles sea area, but if Constantinople is besieged, no
one
> controls access through the Dardanelles. Not that this makes it possible
> for any major powers to pass through the Dardanelles and also makes it
> possible for enemy fleets to enter the area to reach the Constantinople
> blockade box."
>
> So that answers my question; it seems like this should have been part of
> 6.2.1.3 instead of in the Miscellaneous Rules section.
>
> So:
>
> I Fleet at Constantinople
> II Fleet at Candia
>
> --
> J.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> eia mailing list
> eia@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
>
>