| Christopher Smith on 15 Aug 2003 16:49:51 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: FW: [ALACPP] bound for success! |
On Fri, 2003-08-15 at 09:22, Jason Fredrickson wrote: > Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't this exactly what std::transform is > designed to let you do? So you'd want something like: Wow! I have never been shown the transform function before. I always found it strange that STL had no analogue to collect. Learn something new every day! :-) The bind in your example seems a little off, as it looks like it assumes aTransformationFunction is a binary function, but Gavin's sample indicates it's unary. Am I missing something? -- Christopher Smith <x@xxxxxxxx> _______________________________________________ alacpp mailing list alacpp@xxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/alacpp